Friday, January 16, 2009

Parts 3,4 & 5 are up too

http://www.sfpulpit.com/2009/01/15/clarifying-calvinism-part-3/
http://www.sfpulpit.com/2009/01/15/clarifying-calvinism-part-4/
http://www.sfpulpit.com/2009/01/16/clarifying-calvinism-part-5/

1 comment:

ScottH said...

Phil makes it real plain. At least he doesn't claim that Arminianism is a "damnable" doctrine! Like some "preachers" who claim that Calvinism is "damnable!"